MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012060981 · doi:10.1115/ipack2005-73219

Future of Thermal Management of High End Video Cards in ATX and BTX

2005· article· en· W2012060981 on OpenAlexaff
Gamal Refai-Ahmed, Mohammed Tantoush, Colin Novak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D IC and TSV technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGraphics processing unitGraphicsFocus (optics)MultimediaUnit (ring theory)Computer graphics (images)Embedded systemOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study aims to examine the future of the thermal management of video cards in PC systems. The primary focus of this investigation is on high end video card applications in both the ATX and BTX platforms. In this article, the thermo-mechanical architecture of these platforms will be revealed along with a discussion of the power density road map of both the graphics processing unit (GPU) and video processor unit (VPU) expected to be in use until the year 2010. Recommendations of how to extend the air cooling limit for video cards in either the ATX or BTX platforms will be part of the conclusions of this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D IC and TSV technologiesFrench-language works237,207