MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012062312 · doi:10.1142/s0219581x12400169

CATHODOLUMINESCENCE AND PHOTOLUMINESCENCE OF NV CENTERS

2012· article· en· W2012062312 on OpenAlexafffund
David Roy-Guay, Michel Pioro-Ladrière, Denis Morris, Alexandre Tallaire, Jocelyn Achard, Dominique Drouin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Nanoscience · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsCathodoluminescenceDiamondMaterials scienceQubitOptoelectronicsVacancy defectQuantum sensorPhotoluminescenceCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Coupling (piping)QuantumQuantum informationPhysicsQuantum networkCondensed matter physicsLuminescenceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond are a promising candidate as a solid state qubit memory for quantum information as they possess very long coherence times even at room temperature. Furthermore, NV centers are very sensitive to their electromagnetic environment and are addressable in the GHz frequency range. Here we review our progress towards the detection of single NV centers for the implementation of fast on demand coupling between NV centers and GHz electromagnetic fields. Precisely, we present efforts towards mapping NV centers with a cathodoluminescence setup. Developing such capability is important for patterning local one-qubit gates for the application of high amplitude electromagnetic fields as a tuning parameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of NanoscienceSame topicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207