Nucleoplasmin Interaction with Protamines. Involvement of the Polyglutamic Tract
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Different recombinant forms of nucleoplasmin including truncations at the carboxyl-terminal end of the molecule (r-NP121, r-NP142) have been expressed and purified. All of them were found to oligomerize, forming pentameric complexes which, according to their hydrodynamic properties, can be modeled by oblate ellipsoids of constant width. In this model, the highly charged carboxyl ends appear to be arranged around a pentameric core along the plane defined by the major axes of the ellipsoid. Importantly, all the recombinant forms appear to be able to decondense protamine-containing sperm nuclei. However, although the stoichiometry with which protamines bind to these forms appears to be constant (2.5 mol of protamine/mol of nucleoplasmin pentamer), the efficiency with which they remove protamines from the sperm DNA decreases in the following order: o-NP > r-NP142 > or = r-NP >> r-NP121. Therefore, the main polyglutamic tract of nucleoplasmin (which is absent in r-NP121), while enhancing the efficiency of protamine removal, is not indispensable for sperm chromatin decondensation in the biological model we have used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".