MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2012090324 · doi:10.1029/2005jd006832

Global retrieval of columnar aerosol single scattering albedo from space‐based observations

2007· article· en· W2012090324 on OpenAlexafffund
Rong‐Ming Hu, Randall V. Martin, T. D. Fairlie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric SciencesHarvard UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsAerosolAERONETEnvironmental scienceTotal Ozone Mapping SpectrometerLidarSingle-scattering albedoRemote sensingModerate-resolution imaging spectroradiometerAlbedo (alchemy)Radiative transferSatelliteAtmospheric radiative transfer codesAtmospheric sciencesOptical depthOzone Monitoring InstrumentMeteorologyPhysicsGeologyOpticsStratosphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We retrieve the global distribution of columnar single scattering albedo (ω0) by taking advantage of the high sensitivity of satellite measurements at ultraviolet channels by the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) to both aerosol optical depth and ω0 and the high sensitivity of satellite measurements at visible channels by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) to aerosol optical depth. A radiative transfer model (LIDORT) is used to calculate the local ω0 that reproduces the TOMS aerosol index, when constrained by MODIS aerosol optical depth and by relative vertical profiles from a global chemical transport model (GEOS‐CHEM). The simulated aerosol profiles are evaluated with lidar measurements of aerosol extinction. The retrieved ω0 at 360 nm is near 1 over the remote ocean, in contrast with values of 0.75 to 0.9 over regions dominated by biomass burning and mineral dust aerosol. The retrieval uncertainty is 15%. We validate our retrieval with measurements from the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET); the correlation coefficient, slope, and intercept are 0.75, 0.99, and 0.02 respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→