Les complémentarités institutionnelles du modèle québécois de développement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si le fonctionnement de l’économie québécoise poursuit principalement une logique libérale en raison de sa forte intégration continentale, divers facteurs historiques et culturels ont amené l’État du Québec à intervenir plus largement dans l’économie et à promouvoir un partage des fonctions de régulation avec certains groupes constitués de la société civile. À partir de la théorie des complémentarités institutionnelles, la présente étude cherche à alimenter le débat sur l’avenir du modèle québécois de développement. Refusant une approche manichéenne, cette étude repose sur l’hypothèse selon laquelle la performance économique du modèle québécois de développement serait fonction du degré d’intégration entre les institutions du libre marché et les institutions favorisant la redistribution des richesses et la participation citoyenne à la gouverne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".