MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012093225 · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.111

Association of Long ATXN2 CAG Repeat Sizes With Increased Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

2011· article· en· W2012093225 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Hussein Daoud, Véronique Belzil, Sandra Martins, Mike Sabbagh, Pierre Provencher, Lucette Lacomblez, Vincent Meininger, William Camu, Nicolas Dupré, Patrick A. Dion, Guy A. Rouleau

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Neurology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisSpinocerebellar ataxiaAlleleGeneticsMedicineGeneCohortBiologyDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the ataxin 2 (ATXN2) CAG repeat size in a cohort of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and healthy controls. Large (CAG)(n) alleles of the ATXN2 gene (27-33 repeats) were recently reported to be associated with an increased risk of ALS. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: France and Quebec, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 556 case patients with ALS and 471 healthy controls; both groups of participants are of French or French-Canadian origin. RESULTS: We observed a significant association between ATXN2 high-length alleles (≥29 CAG repeats) and ALS in French and French-Canadian ALS populations. Furthermore, we identified spinocerebellar ataxia type 2-pathogenic polyglutamine expansions (≥32 CAG repeats) in both familial and sporadic ALS cases. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, our findings support ATXN2 high-length repeats as a risk factor for ALS and further indicate a genetic link between spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 and ALS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of NeurologySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207