Refractory severe facial nerve cross-stimulation and loss of auditory sensation after ten years of uneventful cochlear implant use. A rare and challenging case
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation has been well described. When the implant is first activated it is usually possible to 'programme out' the unwanted cross-stimulation. We report an exceptional case of delayed facial nerve stimulation and auditory failure after ten years of uncomplicated implant use. This sudden change proved refractory to reprogramming strategies. The patient refused contralateral implantation as he felt there was residual aided hearing. The implant was removed and replaced. Integrity testing of the explanted device showed it to be functioning normally. Severe facial nerve cross-stimulation persisted and the patient failed to regain his previous auditory sensation. Subsequently, despite extensive investigation and a trial of fluoride therapy, after a third implant he has performed equally badly leading to non-use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it