MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012106912 · doi:10.1115/detc2011-47682

Multi-Modal Nonlinear Forced Vibrations of Circular Cylindrical Shells of Arbitrary Shapes

2011· article· en· W2012106912 on OpenAlexafffund
Galyna Pilgun, Marco Amabili

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanada Research ChairsMcGill University
KeywordsNonlinear systemVibrationMathematical analysisMathematicsBoundary value problemModalShell (structure)InertiaConvergence (economics)GeometryPhysicsClassical mechanicsAcousticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-amplitude nonlinear forced vibrations of a circular cylindrical panel with a complex base, clamped at the edges are investigated. The Sanders-Koiter and the Donnell nonlinear shell theories are used to calculate the strain energy; in-plane inertia is retained. A mesh-free technique based on classic approximate functions and the R-function theory is used to build the discrete model of the nonlinear vibrations. This allows for constructing the sequences of admissible functions that satisfy given boundary conditions in domains with complex geometries. The problem is solved in two steps: a linear analysis is conducted to identify natural frequencies and corresponding natural modes to be used in the second step as a basis for nonlinear displacements. The system of ordinary differential equations is obtained by using the Lagrange approach on both steps. Numerical responses are obtained in the spectral neighborhood of the lowest natural frequency. The convergence of nonlinear responses is investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207