MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012135988 · doi:10.1063/1.3253400

On fully nonlinear, vertically trapped wave packets in a stratified fluid on the f-plane

2009· article· en· W2012135988 on OpenAlexafffund
Marek Stastna, Francis Poulin, Kristopher Rowe, Christopher Subich

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsWave packetBaroclinityStratified flowsNonlinear systemClassical mechanicsRossby waveInternal waveStratified flowMechanicsEuler equationsMechanical waveAmplitudePlane waveRotation (mathematics)Wave propagationLongitudinal waveGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ubiquity of solitary and solitarylike internal waves in the coastal ocean has been recognized for some time. Recent theoretical studies of a strongly nonlinear, weakly nonhydrostatic set of layer-averaged model equations have predicted that rotation, for example, on the f-plane, can lead to the decay and subsequent reemergence of internal solitary waves. We reconsider this problem using high resolution numerical simulations of the rotating stratified Euler equations. We find that in certain cases the initial disturbances indeed fission into nonlinear wave packets, with the constituent waves making up the wave packet being, in themselves, nonlinear. However, for typical coastal ocean parameters this only occurs at rotation rates higher than those on Earth on the time scales we are able to simulate. We confirm, using the Dubreil–Jacotin–Long equation, that the vertical structure of the wave-induced currents is well predicted by the fully nonlinear theory of nonrotating internal solitary waves and that weakly nonlinear Korteweg–de Vries equation-based theory fails to describe this structure accurately. Subsequently, we consider flat-crested solitary waves that allow us to fix the wave amplitude while varying the horizontal wavelength. We find that as the waves’ horizontal extent nears the baroclinic Rossby radius more energy is deposited into the wave tail. However, no wave overtaking is observed, and an explanation for this fact is proposed. Finally, we discuss the effects of the horizontal component of the rotation vector and derive an exact equation for rotation modified waves near the equator. This equation demonstrates that in this situation, rotation modifies the structure of the fully nonlinear waves but does not lead to solitary wave decay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207