MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012159777 · doi:10.1002/cne.20706

Morphological and electrophysiological properties of lateral entorhinal cortex layers II and III principal neurons

2005· article· en· W2012159777 on OpenAlexaff
Babak Tahvildari, Ángel Alonso

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Comparative Neurology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrophysiologyBiocytinBiologyEntorhinal cortexNeuroscienceHepatic stellate cellAxonAnatomyPyramidal cellExcitatory postsynaptic potentialNeocortexNeuronSlice preparationBiophysicsHippocampal formationInhibitory postsynaptic potentialEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intrinsic electrophysiology and morphology of neurons from layers II and III of the lateral entorhinal cortex (EC) was investigated in a rat brain slice preparation by intracellular recording and biocytin labeling. Morphologically, we distinguished three groups of layer II principal neurons. The most numerous group included cells with multiple radiating dendrites that spread over layers II and I in a fan-like fashion. While morphologically "fan" neurons were similar to the "stellate" cells of the medial EC, electrophysiologically the fan cells lacked the persistent rhythmic subthreshold oscillations and the very pronounced time-dependent inward rectification typical of the stellate cells. The second group consisted of pyramidal cells that manifested regular spike firing and had a more negative resting potential and a longer spike duration than the fan cells. In the third group we included all those neurons that had diverse multipolar appearances distinct from the fan cells. Neurons in this group had electrophysiological profiles intermediate between those of the fan and pyramidal cells. All neurons recorded in layer III were pyramidal in shape with a basal dendritic tree that could extend into layer V and an axon that could also give off collaterals into layer V. Electrophysiologically, layer III pyramidal cells were very similar to those of layer II. On the basis of these and other data we suggest that in different EC regions layer II neurons may be conducting more input-dependent specialized processing, while cells from layer III may perform a more global or generalized function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Comparative NeurologySame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207