MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012167296 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v7n7p139

Factors Motivating and Inhibiting the Practice of HRIS in Business Organizations: An Empirical Analysis

2014· article· en· W2012167296 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rand Al-Dmour, Zu’bi M. F. Al-Zu’bi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEmployer Branding and e-HRM
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman resource management systemBusinessHuman resource managementKnowledge managementWork (physics)Human resourcesResource (disambiguation)Function (biology)Empirical researchInformation systemManagementComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human Resource Information System (HRIS) software helps the HR function to comply with the human resource (HR) requirements of an organization using web-technology-based channels. The main purposes of this study are to examine the extent to which business organizations in Jordan, as a developing country, have adopted HRIS and to examine the current HRIS usage, benefits, and barriers exhibited within these organizations. A questionnaire was written based on an analysis of previous work. Results indicate that the most frequent applications of HRIS used in business organizations in Jordan are “Employee Records,” followed by “Pay Roll” and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicEmployer Branding and e-HRMFrench-language works237,207