Gender differences in the modulation of cardiac gene expression by dietary conjugated linoleic acid isomersThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled The Cellular and Molecular Basis of Cardiovascular Dysfunction, Dhalla 70th Birthday Tribute.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an earlier study, we showed that dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers can exert differential effects on heart function in male and female rats, but the underlying mechanisms for these actions are not known. Cardiomyocyte Ca2+ cycling is a key event in normal cardiac contractile function and defects in Ca2+ cycling are associated with cardiac dysfunction and heart disease. We therefore hypothesized that abnormalities in the sarcolemmal (SL) and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR)-mediated regulation of intracellular Ca2+ contribute to altered cardiac contractile function of male and female rats owing to dietary CLA isomers. Healthy male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were fed different CLA isomers, (cis-9, trans-11 (c9,t11) and trans-10, cis-12 (t10,c12)) individually and in combination (50:50 mix as triglyceride or fatty acids) from 4 to 20 weeks of age. We determined the mRNA levels of sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) 2a, ryanodine receptor, phospholamban, calsequestrin, Na+-Ca2+-exchanger (NCX), and L-type Ca2+ channel in the left ventricle (LV) by RT-PCR. The SR function was assessed by measurement of Ca2+-uptake and -release. Significant gender differences were seen in the LV NCX, L-type Ca2+ channel, and ryanodine receptor mRNA expression levels in control male and female rats. Dietary CLA isomers in the various forms induced changes in the mRNA levels of SERCA 2a, NCX, and L-type Ca2+ channel in the LV of both male and female hearts. Whereas protein contents of the Ca2+ cycling proteins were altered, changes in SR Ca2+-uptake and -release were also detected in both male and female rats in response to dietary CLA. The results of this study demonstrate that long-term dietary supplementation can modulate cardiac gene expression and SR function in a gender-related manner and may, in part, contribute to altered cardiac contractility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".