Ligninolytic characteristics of <i>Pleurotus ostreatus</i> strain F6 and its monokaryotic protoplast derivative P19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A stable isolate of Pleurotus ostreatus P19 differing in some morphological and physiological characteristics from its parental wild-type strain F6 was obtained via protoplast isolation during the preparation of strains with altered ligninolytic abilities. The isolate is monokaryotic, does not form clamp-connections, and produces much higher activities of enzymes involved in lignin modification (laccase, manganese peroxidase). Cellulase activity was comparable to that of wild-type strain F6, but the xylanase activity was slightly higher in isolate P19. However, this monokaryotic derivative degrades lignin at a slightly lower rate than its parental strain F6. Electron microscopy observations of wood degradation as a function of mycelium growth were performed on three zones of birch wafers delimited according to the distance from the point of inoculation. The different stages of fungal mycelium growth showed differences in the ultrastructural patterns of the decay not only between the strains P19 and F6, but also depending on the distance from the point of inoculation. This suggests a spatio-temporally controlled secretion of enzymes along the hyphae. The enhanced ability of P19 to degrade the condensed forms of lignin in middle lamellae is correlated to its higher laccase activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".