MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012201334 · doi:10.2495/hpsm140381

The application of Differential Evolution to HVAC optimization

2014· article· en· W2012201334 on OpenAlexaffabout
R. W. Derksen, H. Guenther

Bibliographic record

VenueWIT transactions on the built environment · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsManitoba HydroUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPython (programming language)HVACComputer sciencePopulationDifferential evolutionFitness functionApartmentMathematical optimizationGenetic algorithmSimulationReal-time computingEngineeringAlgorithmCivil engineeringMathematicsMechanical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the optimum window area, building aspect ratio and building orientation for an apartment building in two different locations: Winnipeg, Canada and Miami Florida. This application was based on a Python script program called the EnergyPlus analysis program and utilized Differential Evolution as the numerical optimization scheme. EnergyPlus is a whole building load and energy analysis program that is well understood and freely available on the internet. It can be used to both size equipment and perform annual energy analysis. It is widely used in the HVAC industry and has demonstrated a good track record. Differential Evolution is a genetic algorithm that is used to numerically find the global optimum of problems that can have continuous, integer, and discreet variables. It uses the existing population in a generation to determine mutation, and is purported to be faster than other genetic algorithms. The annual energy cost was used for the cost function of the optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWIT transactions on the built environmentSame topicComputational Physics and Python ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207