MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High harmonic generation with a spatially filtered optical parametric amplifier

2008· article· en· W2012207932 on OpenAlexafffund
H. Bandulet, D. Comtois, Andrew D. Shiner, Carlos Trallero–Herrero, N. Kajumba, T. Ozaki, P. B. Corkum, D. M. Villeneuve, J. C. Kieffer, François Légaré

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsPhysicsOptical parametric amplifierParametric statisticsAmplifierHigh harmonic generationParametric oscillatorHarmonicSecond-harmonic generationOpticsOptical amplifierOptoelectronicsQuantum mechanicsLaserStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerous applications of high harmonic generation (HHG), such as attosecond pulse synthesis, depend on the ability to increase the electron recollision energy, which is a quadratic function of the driver wavelength. High-energy infrared pulses obtained from an optical parametric amplifier (OPA) are thus attractive for driving the HHG process, thereby offering the opportunity to yield shorter attosecond pulses. However, the increase in driver wavelength is often outweighed by the poor spatial quality of the OPA source. In this paper, we demonstrate that HHG using OPA signal pulses is significantly improved by spatial filtering in a hollow-core fibre prior to focusing in the gas target in comparison with the unfiltered case. Ion yield measurements in combination with beam profile monitoring in the far field enabled control over the interaction volume. For similar interaction volumes, we observe that with less than half the energy per pulse, the HHG yield can increase by one order of magnitude with spatial filtering. The comparison between the harmonic yields in argon and krypton, and their respective dependence on the peak laser intensity, provide experimental evidence that strongly suggests that the enhancement is due to improved phase matching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical PhysicsSame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207