Behavior of kimberlite indicator minerals during the formation of mechanical dispersion halos in glacial settings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Behavior of kimberlite indicator minerals in glacial settings based on the study of dispersion halo of Pipe CL-25 in the Slave Craton (Canada) is discussed. The compliance of the dispersion halo with the standard object was substantiated for studying the behavior of indicator minerals in glacial settings. The studies showed that ice-rafted indicator minerals did not virtually change at a distance of tens of kilometers; i.e., the minerals are not crushed, rounded, and subjected to physicochemical alterations. Their dispersion is determined by the direction of glacier motion. The results of the studies were compared with the published data, which indicate intense mechanical erosion of minerals under subaquatic conditions related to a glacier, particularly in the central Timan Range. These data are most likely erroneous and related to an incorrect choice of the standard object for studying: minerals described in these works are derived from old intermediate reservoirs reworked by a glacier, and the mentioned changes in minerals are related to the preglacial stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it