MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SOME A PRIORI ERROR ESTIMATES FOR FINITE ELEMENT APPROXIMATIONS OF ELLIPTIC AND PARABOLIC LINEAR STOCHASTIC PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

2014· article· en· W2012240233 on OpenAlexafffund
Christophe Audouze, Prasanth B. Nair

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Uncertainty Quantification · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMathematicsStochastic partial differential equationSuperconvergenceFinite element methodElliptic partial differential equationSobolev spacePartial differential equationParabolic partial differential equationDiscretizationApplied mathematicsA priori and a posterioriMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study some theoretical aspects of Legendre polynomial chaos based finite element approximations of elliptic and parabolic linear stochastic partial differential equations (SPDEs) and provide a priori error estimates in tensor product Sobolev spaces that hold under appropriate regularity assumptions.Our analysis takes place in the setting of finitedimensional noise, where the SPDE coefficients depend on a finite number of second-order random variables.We first derive a priori error estimates for finite element approximations of a class of linear elliptic SPDEs.Subsequently, we consider finite element approximations of parabolic SPDEs coupled with a θ-weighted temporal discretization scheme.We establish conditions under which the time-stepping scheme is stable and derive a priori rates of convergence as a function of spatial, temporal, and stochastic discretization parameters.We later consider steady-state and time-dependent stochastic diffusion equations and illustrate how the general results provided here can be applied to specific SPDE models.Finally, we theoretically analyze primal and adjoint-based recovery of stochastic linear output functionals that depend on the solution of elliptic SPDEs and show that these schemes are superconvergent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Uncertainty QuantificationSame topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207