MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012262817 · doi:10.1021/jp9098683

Structures of Alkali Metal Ion−Adenine Complexes and Hydrated Complexes by IRMPD Spectroscopy and Electronic Structure Calculations

2010· article· en· W2012262817 on OpenAlexaff
Khadijeh Rajabi, Elizabeth A. L. Gillis, Travis D. Fridgen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfrared multiphoton dissociationChemistryTautomerInfrared spectroscopyDissociation (chemistry)IonAlkali metalSpectroscopySpectral lineInfraredComputational chemistryCrystallographyPhysical chemistryStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complexes between adenine and the alkali metal ions Li(+), Na(+), K(+), and Cs(+) have been investigated by infrared multiple photon dissociation (IRMPD) spectroscopy between 2800 and 3900 cm(-1), as have some singly hydrated complexes. The IRMPD spectra clearly show the N-H stretching and the NH(2) symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations of adenine; and for the solvated ions, the O-H stretching vibrations are observed. These experimental spectra were compared with those for a variety of possible structures, including both A9 (A9 refers to the tautomer where hydrogen is on the nitrogen in position 9 of adenine, see Scheme 1) and A7 adenine tautomers, computed using B3-LYP/6-31+G(d,p). By comparing the experimental and the simulated spectra it is possible to rule out various structures and to further assign structures to the species probed in these experiments. Single-point calculations on the B3-LYP/6-31+G(d,p) geometries have been performed at MP2/6-311++G(2d, p) to obtain good estimates of the relative thermochemistries for the different structures. In all cases the computed IR spectrum for the lowest energy structure is consistent with the experimental IRMPD spectrum, but in some cases structural assignment cannot be confirmed based solely upon comparison with the experimental spectra so computed thermochemistries can be used to rule out high-energy structures. On the basis of the IRMPD spectra and the energy calculations, all adenine-M(+) and adenine-M(+)-H(2)O are concluded to be composed of the A7 tautomer of adenine, which is bound to the cations in a bidentate fashion through N3 and N9 (see Scheme 1 for numbering convention). For the hydrated ions water binds directly to the metal ion through oxygen, as would be expected since the metal contains most positive charge density. For the hydrated lithium cation-bound adenine dimer, the water molecule is concluded to be hydrogen bonded to a free basic site of one of the adenine monomers, which is also bound to the lithium cation. Experimental and theoretical results on adenine-Li(+)-H(2)O suggest that the electrosprayed adenine-Li(+) resembles the lowest-energy solution phase ion rather than the lowest-energy gas-phase ion, which is the imine form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207