Femoral Head Blood Flow during Hip Resurfacing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preserving femoral head vascularity during hip resurfacing may avoid femoral neck fractures and late femoral loosening. The posterior approach and notching of the femoral neck influence femoral head perfusion. However, it is not known if standard preparation of the femoral head during hip resurfacing can disrupt blood flow. Ten patients (10 hips) with advanced osteoarthritis having metal-on-metal hip resurfacing by means of a vascular-preserving surgical approach had femoral head blood flow measurements using laser Doppler flowmetry. Nine hips had a mean decrease of 70% in femoral head blood flow after standard reaming and preparation. The data suggest femoral head reaming during hip resurfacing substantially impacts blood flow to the femoral head and infers the extra osseous blood supply is still important in the arthritic femoral head. To avoid damaging the retinacular vessels, surgeons should direct the cylindrical reamer superolaterally staying as close as possible to the inferomedial neck.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".