MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2012285052 · doi:10.1109/wimob.2010.5645006

Iterative detection for zero-padded OFDM in non-regenerative cooperative wireless networks

2010· article· en· W2012285052 on OpenAlexaff
Homa Eghbali, Sami Muhaidat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceDecoding methodsAlgorithmWirelessReduction (mathematics)RelayMinimum mean square errorChannel (broadcasting)MultiplexingComputational complexity theoryBit error rateWireless broadbandWireless networkElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zero-Padding Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (ZP-OFDM) has recently been introduced to avoid coded-OFDM's high decoding complexity. Various sub-optimal ZP-OFDM receivers have been developed in the literature to tradeoff performance with implementation complexity. In this paper, we propose a new iterative detection scheme for ZP-OFDM transmissions tailored to broadband cooperative networks with single relay and amplify-and-forward relaying. By avoiding channel dependent matrix inversion, which is inevitable in the case of minimum mean square error (MMSE)-ZP-OFDM transmissions, and incorporating linear processing techniques, we show that our proposed receiver is able to bring significant complexity reduction in the receiver design, while outperforming cooperative MMSE-ZP-OFDM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network Coding→French-language works237,207→