Stanniocalcin gene expression during mouse urogenital development: A possible role in mesenchymal-epithelial signalling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stanniocalcin (STC) is a polypeptide hormone first discovered in fish and more recently in mammals. In mammals, the STC gene is widely expressed and the hormone is involved in a variety of functions, but STC does not normally circulate in the blood. In both kidney and gut, STC regulates phosphate fluxes across the transporting epithelia, whereas in brain it protects neurons against cerebral ischemia and promotes neuronal cell differentiation. However, the gene is most highly expressed in ovary and expression is dramatically up-regulated by both pregnancy and nursing. STC mRNA levels are also high in the developing mouse embryo, but literally nothing is known of the tissue pattern of gene expression. Therefore, the aim of this study was to map the temporal and spatial patterns of gene expression during mouse embryologic development, starting with the urogenital system where the gene is so highly expressed in adults. STC mRNA was evident as early as E10.5 in both the mesonephros and genital ridge. Between E10.5 and 14.5 in developing kidney, STC was produced in undifferentiated mesenchyme cells and sequestered by ureteric bud epithelial cells that did not express the gene but nonetheless contained high levels of STC protein. Thereafter, the distribution pattern resembled that in adults such that gene expression predominated in collecting duct cells, whereas protein was present in most nephron segments. The pattern of gene expression during gonadal development was sexually dimorphic. In males, expression was first evident on E12.5 in interstitial mesenchyme cells surrounding the developing sex cords, whereas the protein accumulated in developing gonocytes within the sex cords that did not express the gene. This pattern became more pronounced over the course of gestation. In contrast, ovarian gene expression was only weakly evident during development. Collectively, the evidence suggests that in addition to its regulatory effects in adults, STC has novel and distinctive roles in the mesenchymal-epithelial interactions that are vital to normal organogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".