MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012298845 · doi:10.1353/his.0.0055

Forging a New Space for Lay Male Piety: St. Vincent de Paul Societies in Urban Quebec and Ontario, 1846–1890

2009· article· fr· W2012298845 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michael Gauvreau

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPietyColonialismSAINTSociologySpace (punctuation)Gender studiesPolitical scienceElement (criminal law)LawHistoryArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Après son introduction au Canada en 1846, la Société de Saint-Vincent de Paul s'est rapidement taillé une place dans les paroisses et les communautés catholiques des principales villes coloniales du Canada. Organisation laïque exclusivement masculine, la SVP était d'abord et avant tout une société pieuse dont la bienfaisance et l'aide aux indigents ne servaient qu'à parfaire la piété de ses membres, s'appropriant un statut et un espace habituellement réservés au clergé. Les vertus auxquelles se vouait la SVP avaient également pour but de justifier la présence d'hommes laïcs dans la prestation de la bienfaisance, une sphère traditionnellement dominée par les ordres religieux catholiques féminins. Par ses secours de bienfaisance, qu'elle prodiguait grâce à un système de visites à domicile, la SVP jouait un rôle important non seulement en venant en aide aux pauvres des villes, mais également en définissant les limites et les identités des catholiques des grandes villes du Canada de l'époque victorienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0240.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207