Bibliographic record
Abstract
When discussing memory in Spain, historians are really addressing their appraisal of the successive political regimes in the country since 1931. This is how we see the Second Republic (19311939), Civil War (19361939), Franco's dictatorship (19391975) and the constitutional monarchy (since 1977). According to some historians, the source of our, supposedly, feeble democracy and historical amnesia could be traced to the defeat of the Republic in 1939 which put Spain in a different path in respect to anti-Fascist Europe. Following their argument, the Left that resurfaced with democracy in 1977 and particularly the Socialist Party was not at the same level of anti-Fascism and Republicanism that the one defeated in the war. Cowed, it agreed to its structural, permanent submission to the conditions for the restoration of democracy imposed by the heirs of Francoism. Among those conditions missed was forgetting and making society forget (Pacto de Olvido), the repression carried out by the dictatorship and forgiving the criminals. On the other side, those who defend that there was no pact to forget, tends to have fewer problems with the quality of present day democracy and the polices of compensation of victims implemented by the Socialist Party when in power between 1982 and 1996. But what do ordinary Spaniards think of all this memory War? And why? This article not only discusses these issues it also proposes venues to use the tragedy of the Civil War to promote historical knowledge among the general population. Finally, it argues that the experiences of the past and the democratic values of Contemporary Spain could be used to promote tolerance and understanding in other countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".