MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012368965 · doi:10.1145/1837210.1837238

Cache friendly sparse matrix-vector multiplication

2010· article· en· W2012368965 on OpenAlexaff
Sardar Anisul Haque, Shahadat Hossain, Marc Moreno Maza

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMultiplication (music)Parallel computingMatrix multiplicationCache-oblivious algorithmLocalityCacheKernel (algebra)Context (archaeology)Cache algorithmsConjugate gradient methodSparse matrixAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceCPU cacheMathematicsDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sparse matrix-vector multiplication or SpMXV is an important kernel in scientific computing. For example, the conjugate gradient method (CG) is an iterative linear system solving process where multiplication of the coefficient matrix A with a dense vector x is the main computational step accounting for as much as 90% of the overall running time. Though the total number of arithmetic operations (involving nonzero entries only) to compute Ax is fixed, reducing the probability of cache misses per operation is still a challenging area of research. This preprocessing is done once and its cost is amortized by repeated multiplications. Computers that employ cache memory to improve the speed of data access rely on reuse of data that are brought into the cache memory. The challenge is to exploit data locality especially for unstructured problems: modeling data locality in this context is hard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207