Effect of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and environmental temperature on forestomach electromyographic activity and gastrointestinal contraction in sheep
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four crossover design experiments were conducted with sheep to test the hypothesis that vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) affects gastrointestinal motility with implications for digesta flow. Sheep were shorn and surgically prepared with electrodes implanted on the forestomach, cannulae in the rumen, duodenum or/and ilieum, and a left gastric artery catheter. VIP (1 or 1.5 nmol min−1) or saline (control) was infused for 10 min at half-hour or hour intervals for 4 or 7 d during treatment periods. VIP transiently inhibited electromyographic (EMG) activity of the reticulum, reticulo-omasal orifice (ROO) and omasum for 3 to 8 min during the 10-min infusion periods. VIP infusion extended the duration of ROO opening (P < 0.01). The gastrointestinal lumen pressure pattern was also transiently influenced by VIP, with an increase of quiescent time. Cold exposure of sheep stimulated a relatively higher motility in the ROO and omasum. The results indicate that the inhibitory effect of VIP on the reticulum, ROO and omasum electrical activity is transient; however, its action to extend the duration of opening of the ROO may facilitate digesta passage. Key words: Sheep, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, electromyographic activity, reticulo-omasal orifice
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".