MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012415022 · doi:10.7202/012290ar

Rhétorique d’une mise en espace

2006· article· fr· W2012415022 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProtée · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtAppropriationPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Du 11 mars au 26 mai 2003, le Musée des beaux-arts de Lyon a accueilli la collection de Grenville Lindall Winthrop (1864-1943), léguée au Fogg Art Museum de l’Université Harvard. C’est donc une collection qui se déplace à la rencontre d’un nouveau public, pour combler d’autres attentes, émotion et plaisir esthétique, que celles prévues par le collectionneur, qui visait un public d’étudiants et de chercheurs et dont les objectifs étaient plutôt didactiques et pédagogiques. Pour concilier ces attentes différentes, le musée exploite son architecture et le temps éprouvé par le corps au cours de son exploration, afin de mettre en oeuvre des figures de rhétorique liées à la temporalité, qui anticipent, diffèrent, ralentissent ou accélèrent toute forme d’appropriation de la collection par les visiteurs, afin de suggérer le premier lieu d’exposition de la collection, la maison de Winthrop à New York.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it