Bibliographic record
Abstract
Du 11 mars au 26 mai 2003, le Musée des beaux-arts de Lyon a accueilli la collection de Grenville Lindall Winthrop (1864-1943), léguée au Fogg Art Museum de l’Université Harvard. C’est donc une collection qui se déplace à la rencontre d’un nouveau public, pour combler d’autres attentes, émotion et plaisir esthétique, que celles prévues par le collectionneur, qui visait un public d’étudiants et de chercheurs et dont les objectifs étaient plutôt didactiques et pédagogiques. Pour concilier ces attentes différentes, le musée exploite son architecture et le temps éprouvé par le corps au cours de son exploration, afin de mettre en oeuvre des figures de rhétorique liées à la temporalité, qui anticipent, diffèrent, ralentissent ou accélèrent toute forme d’appropriation de la collection par les visiteurs, afin de suggérer le premier lieu d’exposition de la collection, la maison de Winthrop à New York.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".