Reconstitution of an Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase (eNOS), hsp90, and Caveolin-1 Complex in Vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The activity of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) is regulated by its subcellular localization, phosphorylation and through its interaction with different proteins. The association of eNOS with caveolin-1 (Cav) is believed to maintain eNOS in an inactive state; however, increased association of eNOS to heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) is observed following activation. In this study, we investigate the relationship between caveolin and hsp90 as opposing regulatory proteins on eNOS function. Immunoprecipitation of Cav-1 from bovine lung microvascular endothelial cells shows that eNOS and hsp90 are present in the Cav-1 complex. eNOS and hsp90 from the lysate also interact with exogenous glutathione S-transferase-linked caveolin-1 (GST-Cav), and the addition of calcium-activated calmodulin (CaM) to the GST-Cav complex partially inhibited the association of eNOS and hsp90. Purified eNOS associates with GST-Cav specifically through the caveolin-scaffolding domain (residues 82-101); however, the addition of CaM slightly, but nonstatistically, reduces eNOS binding to GST-Cav. When hsp90 is present in the binding reaction, the addition of increasing concentrations of CaM significantly displaces eNOS and hsp90 from GST-Cav. eNOS enzymatic activity is also less sensitive to inhibition by the caveolin scaffolding peptide (residues 82-101) when eNOS is prebound to hsp90. Collectively, our results show that the actions of CaM on eNOS dissociation from caveolin are facilitated in the presence of hsp90.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".