Bibliographic record
Abstract
La revue des A.A.T est une revue destinée à des praticiens, écrite par des praticiens. Son objectif principal est de permettre la diffusion d’une pensée vivante, interrogeant aussi bien nos pratiques que la théorie transactionnaliste qui les sous-tend. Se pose la question de la qualité des textes. Jacques Hillion possède un master en psychopédagogie perceptive de l’Université Fernando Pessoa (Porto). Il est actuellement doctorant en Éducation à l’Université de Sherbrooke (Canada). Son thème de recherche est l’aide à l’écriture pour les étudiants universitaires. Avec une grande gentillesse, il a accepté de nous livrer quelques points de repères sur l’écriture dans le domaine de la recherche en sciences humaines. Il nous donne ainsi de précieuses balises, certaines très concrètes, à même de nous guider dans notre travail de conceptualisation et d’écriture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".