Bibliographic record
Abstract
La revue des A.A.T est une revue destinée à des praticiens, écrite par des praticiens. Son objectif principal est de permettre la diffusion d’une pensée vivante, interrogeant aussi bien nos pratiques que la théorie transactionnaliste qui les sous-tend. Se pose la question de la qualité des textes. Jacques Hillion possède un master en psychopédagogie perceptive de l’Université Fernando Pessoa (Porto). Il est actuellement doctorant en Éducation à l’Université de Sherbrooke (Canada). Son thème de recherche est l’aide à l’écriture pour les étudiants universitaires. Avec une grande gentillesse, il a accepté de nous livrer quelques points de repères sur l’écriture dans le domaine de la recherche en sciences humaines. Il nous donne ainsi de précieuses balises, certaines très concrètes, à même de nous guider dans notre travail de conceptualisation et d’écriture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.037 | 0.088 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.030 | 0.025 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".