De la célébration au combat politique : l’adversaire dans les éloges de la Restauration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discours à la gloire des Bourbons, les éloges politiques de la Restauration ne se contentent pourtant jamais de scander les grandes heures de la monarchie. La hantise d'une Révolution inachevée – malgré l'optimisme inhérent au genre – parcourt ces discours qui en traquent obsessionnellement les résurgences et tisse un lien traumatique entre les révolutionnaires et l'opposition aux Bourbons restaurés. Aussi les thuriféraires de la Restauration n'ont-ils de cesse de dénoncer, brocarder ou menacer leurs adversaires, déployant contre eux une véritable rhétorique du combat politique qui loge la polémique au cœur même de l'éloge. Trahissant le rêve d'une unanimité reconstruite par-delà la déchirure révolutionnaire, en même temps que l'impossibilité à penser le présent politique hors de ce traumatisme, la figure de l'adversaire signale ainsi l'aporie tragique de cette parole de gloire et avec elle, peut-être, l'aporie fatale d'un régime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".