MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012496307 · doi:10.1021/ef020098y

Investigating the Stability Mechanism of Water-in-Diluted Bitumen Emulsions through Isolation and Characterization of the Stabilizing Materials at the Interface

2002· article· en· W2012496307 on OpenAlexaff
Xing Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSyncrude (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphalteneEmulsionAsphaltTolueneChemical engineeringHeptaneMaterials scienceCharacterization (materials science)Contact angleDiffusionChemistryOrganic chemistryComposite materialNanotechnologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In oil sand industry, formation of a stable salty water-in-diluted bitumen emulsion poses a serious corrosion problem at the bitumen upgrading plant. Previous studies indicated the presence of a “critical concentration” of bitumen in the emulsion, above which the oil−water interface is flexible and the water-in-diluted bitumen emulsion is stable, but below which the interface becomes rigid and the emulsion is unstable. The cause of this critical concentration was investigated through isolation and characterization of the interfacial material from the emulsions both below and above the critical concentration. The analytical data showed that, in heptane/toluene(1:1)-diluted bitumen emulsions, the flexible interfacial film is composed of a mixture of asphaltene and carboxylic salts with a combined H/C ratio of 1.32 while the rigid interfacial film is composed of asphaltene alone with a H/C ratio of 1.13. The carboxylic salts are water insoluble and are likely sodium naphthenates containing >20 carbons. The presence of sodium naphthenates might hinder the conformational change of asphaltene at the interface, necessary for rigid film formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations152
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207