AUGUSTO ROA BASTOS Y <i>LOS CONJURADOS DEL QUILOMBO DEL GRAN CHACO</i> (2001): UN LEGADO LITERARIO PARA LA INTEGRACIÓN LATINOAMERICANA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tomás Eloy Martínez encomiaba el texto inédito que el autor le había enviado y que formaría parte de la obra colectiva Los conjurados del Quilombo del Gran Chaco (en adelante Los conjurados).El escritor argentino afirmaba que era una "obra maestra" sobre "el arte y la guerra".Estimo que, además de esta dimensión universalista, el texto de Roa Bastos acerca de la Guerra de la Triple Alianza es una reflexión muy puntual en torno a dos temas fundamentales del debate cultural contemporáneo sobre América Latina: la regionalización y el latinoamericanismo.Los conjurados formula indirectamente la pregunta fundamental de la globalización: ¿se podrá superar la cartografía nacional que rige a los sujetos?Adicionalmente, pone el dedo en la llaga del latinoamericanismo al tematizar el primer gran nacionalismo de masas del continente y la guerra interamericana como una discontinuidad mayor de su genealogía.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".