MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012588920 · doi:10.1029/2002jc001715

Topographic steering of a mid‐depth drifter in an eddy‐like circulation region south and east of the Hawaiian Ridge

2003· article· en· W2012588920 on OpenAlexaff
Richard E. Thomson, Howard J. Freeland

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsNorth Pacific Marine Science Organization
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeamountDrifterRidgeSeafloor spreadingEddyEquatorLatitudeGeodesyClimatologyOceanographyPaleontologyGeographyMeteorologyLagrangianTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Profiling Autonomous Lagrangian Current Explorer (PALACE float) deployed in June 1997 at a “parking depth” of 1250 m depth to the south of Hawaii drifted westward within the North Equatorial Current for about a year before stalling in a region of directionally variable, eddy‐like flow centered near 21°N, 168°W, within the intersection region of the Pacific Seamounts and Hawaiian Ridge. The float remained within the 5‐km‐deep, eddying regime for more than 3 years before ending communication in October 2001. During its year in the North Equatorial Current, the float traveled roughly 1400 km westward along ≈18°N latitude at a mean mid‐depth speed of 4.39 ± 2.19 cm s−1. Within the eddying region, mid‐depth currents remained relatively strong but directions became highly variable and the mean westward drift diminished to 0.05 ± 2.67 cm s−1. Close examination of the 15‐day trajectory data reveals that the float entered the eddying region after making an abrupt northward turn along the shallow (∼2000 m deep) eastern limb of the Pacific Seamounts. Similar depth‐related directional changes were frequently observed throughout the 3.4‐year drift within the eddying region, consistent with modification of the mid‐depth circulation by the underlying seafloor topography. On the basis of the density structure obtained along the float trajectory, only topographic features with scale lengths of roughly 50 km or more have a significant effect on the mid‐depth flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207