MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Starting early

2008· letter· en· W2012591620 on OpenAlexaff
Brenda Banwell, John G. Sled

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2008
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite matterMultiple sclerosisPathologyMedicineNeuroscienceMagnetic resonance imagingInflammationLesionAtrophyDiseaseRadiologyPsychologyInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered an inflammatory autoimmune disease of CNS white matter. Quantitative MRI measures of visible white matter lesion load, however, have shown that the burden of inflammatory disease is a relatively insensitive metric of physical disability, cognitive impairment, or long-term prognosis. While MRI has proven to be an invaluable tool for MS diagnosis and response to anti-inflammatory based therapies, 1 the relatively poor correlation between measures of inflammation and clinical sequelae has prompted revitalized recognition of the neurodegenerative aspects of MS. Pathologic studies have emphasized the extensive network of axonal transactions and neuronal cell loss in lesional and normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), and have confirmed that a significant aspect of MS pathology also resides in cortical and subcortical gray matter. Advances in MR imaging are ever-increasingly able to detect lesions in the cerebral mantle and in deep gray structures,2 gray matter loss can be detected even at the time of an initial demyelinating event,3 and apparently NAWM in patients with MS has been shown to have reduced structural integrity. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1850.129

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207