MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012602566 · doi:10.1089/hyb.2006.049

Production and Characterization of a Monoclonal Antibody to <i>Francisella tularensis</i> Lipopolysaccharide

2007· article· en· W2012602566 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Gubbins, Jody D. Berry, Lisa Schmidt, Teresa Cabral, Amin Kabani, Raymond S. W. Tsang

Bibliographic record

VenueHybridoma · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrancisella tularensisMonoclonal antibodyLipopolysaccharideBiologyAntigenVirologyMicrobiologyAntibodyTularemiaVirulenceImmunologyGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Having the capacity to detect and identify pathogens that can be employed in a bioterror attack is critical from both a public health and defence perspective. Immunodiagnostic assays are useful tools for enhancing such detection capabilities. In order to develop an immunodiagnostic assay for the detection of Francisella tularensis, a murine monoclonal antibody (MAb) was developed, using the live vaccine strain (LVS) of F. tularensis as the inoculating antigen. A single MAb, F94G2-1, which is specific for the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of this bacterium was developed and characterized. An indirect ELISA using purified LPS was effective in determining reactivity of the MAb against its target. An immunodotblot and a manually printed antigen microarray were also tested as suitable detection methods. Both assays showed that MAb F94G2-1 has excellent specificity for F. tularensis LPS and demonstrate the utility of using the same MAb in a variety of immunodiagnostic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHybridomaSame topicBacillus and Francisella bacterial researchFrench-language works237,207