Design of Joint Angle Profiles for a Planar Five-Link Bipedal System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A set of joint angle profiles for a five-link bipedal model walking on level ground is designed. One feature of the joint angle profiles is that after an impulsive energy injection at an early stage of each step, the mechanical energy of the bipedal system remains constant for the rest of the step. This feature is of special interest in the studies of energetics of bipedal walking and can be beneficial to the design of modern energy-storing prosthetic feet. The joint angle profiles also satisfy four kinematic constraints, i.e., the walking speed, stance knee bias, upright posture of the trunk and motion coordination. To obtain acceptable gait patterns, a set of parameters is carefully tuned to satisfy extra conditions (repeatable gait, no hyperextension, and no scuffing at the swing knee). This work can provide some insight into the mechanics of bipedal walking and has potential to establish a framework for estimating the optimal energy storage of modern prosthetic feet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it