<i>C</i><sub>3<i>v</i></sub>-Symmetrical Tribenzotriquinacenes as Hosts for C<sub>60</sub> and C<sub>70</sub> in Solution and in the Solid State
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Various tribenzotriquinacenes (TBTQs), most of which incorporate six functional groups at the periphery of their C3v-symmetrical, rigid and convex-concave molecular framework, have been studied with respect to their ability to form supramolecular complexes with the C60 and C70 fullerenes, either in the solid state or in solution. The hexabromo derivative Br6-TBTQ was cocrystallized with C60 as [Br6-TBTQ<C60 x toluene] but, as studied by UV/vis and (1)H NMR spectroscopy, aggregation in benzene, toluene, or carbon disulfide solutions was not observed. Likewise, in contrast to the related C5v-symmetrical decakis(alkylthio)corannulenes, neither the parent hydrocarbon, nor a related hexamethoxy, or two hexakis(alkylthio) derivatives exhibited color, or complexation-induced chemical shift (CIS) changes with C60 or C70. The novel tris(2,3-thianthreno)triquinacene (o-S2C6H4)3-TBTQ, a TBTQ derivative extended by three 1,2-benzodithiino wings, and synthesized from Br6-TBTQ, was found to form 1:1 complexes with C60 and C70 in both benzene and toluene solutions. Association constants were determined for the respective complexes, viz. (o-S2C6H4)3-TBTQ<C60 (K(assoc) = 977 +/- 56) and (o-S2C6H4)3-TBTQ<C70 (463 +/- 49, both in benzene). The X-ray single crystal and molecular structures of the pure host and of the aggregates [(o-S2C6H4)3-TBTQ<2 C60 x 2.5 chlorobenzene] were also determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".