L'invention de la littérature orale : les épopées de l'espace soudano-sahélien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le débat universitaire sur la littérature orale est avant tout d'ordre épistémologique. Cette étude pose le problème des critères de définition de l'épopée africaine et remet en question les positions de l'« école de Dakar », qui opte pour l'épopée de type homérique. Ce qui importe en fait, c'est la nature même du récit épique africain et plus encore du récit oral. La question fondamentale touche donc l'existence de ce genre de texte, son élaboration, sa transmission, ses variantes et aussi sa réception, modes que l'analyse littéraire a tendance à ignorer. D'où la notion de « texte introuvable », parce qu'en continuelles transformations. D'où aussi l'importance de la réception - qui inclut l'institution littéraire - dans la reconnaissance de la littérature orale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".