The application of digital image techniques to determine the large stress–strain behaviors of soft materials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Understanding the mechanical properties of soft materials such as stress–strain behavior over a large deformation domain is essential for both mechanical and biological applications. Conventional measurement methods have limited access to these properties because of the difficulties in accurately measuring large deformations of soft materials. In this study, we optimized digital image correlation (DIC) method to measure the large‐strain deformations by considering referencing scheme and frame rate. The optimized DIC was utilized to estimate strain in characterizing the stress–strain behavior of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer as a model soft material. A series of comparative experimental studies and finite element analysis were performed; they indicated the advantages of optimized DIC over conventional methods such as robustness to slip, insensitivity to boundary conditions, and the ability to yield consistent and reliable results. These advantages enabled the optimized DIC to perform an in‐depth analysis of the behavior of soft materials at large strain domain. An empirical constitutive equation to describe the large stress–strain behavior of PDMS was proposed and verified by finite element simulations that show excellent agreements with experimental results. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it