MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012667804 · doi:10.4000/rhr.5248

Inquisition et judaïsants dans l’Amérique espagnole (1569-1649)

2010· article· fr· W2012667804 on OpenAlexaff
Ricardo Escobar Quevedo

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Women Writers
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society for the History of Medicine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Notre étude vise à présenter la première typologie multidimensionnelle du marranisme ibéro-américain (dans la mesure où elle prend en compte, outre la racine religieuse de ce phénomène, ses dimensions culturelles, économiques et sociales), ainsi que les modalités d’association des groupes implantés en Amérique espagnole et l’articulation de leurs réseaux familiaux, religieux et commerciaux avec la métropole, l’Afrique et les juiveries européennes. Le cadre spatio-temporel retenu couvre les te...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicEarly Modern Women WritersFrench-language works237,207