MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012690391 · doi:10.1021/ic502075x

Rare-Earth Manganese Copper Phosphides REMnCu<sub>4</sub>P<sub>3</sub> (RE = Gd–Ho): The First Quaternary Ordered Variants of the YCo<sub>5</sub>P<sub>3</sub>-Type Structure

2014· article· en· W2012690391 on OpenAlexafffund
Krishna K. Ramachandran, Stanislav S. Stoyko, C. Scott Mullen, Arthur Mar

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOrthorhombic crystal systemChemistryCrystallographyManganeseCopperZigzagTransition metalElectrical resistivity and conductivityMetalGroup (periodic table)Type (biology)Crystal structureGeometryPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quaternary rare-earth phosphides REMnCu(4)P(3) (RE = Gd-Ho) were obtained from direct reactions of the elements at 800 °C. They are the first examples in which ordering of two different transition-metal atoms takes place within the orthorhombic YCo(5)P(3)-type structure [Pearson symbol oP36, space group Pnma, Z = 4; a = 12.667(2)-12.6489(4) Å, b = 3.8119(7)-3.7755(1) Å, and c = 10.895(2)-10.8632(4) Å for RE = Gd-Ho]. Columns of trigonal prisms centered by P atoms are connected in propellor-shaped units in zigzag arrangements to generate square-pyramidal (CN5) sites that are occupied by Mn atoms and tetrahedral sites (CN4) that are occupied by Cu atoms. Spin-polarized band-structure calculations predict that the hypothetical compound YMnCu(4)P(3) will exhibit magnetic ordering. Electrical resistivity measurements on TbMnCu(4)P(3) indicate a poor metal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207