MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012715314 · doi:10.2118/2008-201-ea

Dewatering Coalbed Methane Wells Using ESPCPs

2008· article· en· W2012715314 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michał Krawiec, C.M. Finn, J.R. Cockbill, D.E. Fortnum

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalbed methaneDewateringPetroleum engineeringMethaneEnvironmental scienceGeologyMining engineeringWaste managementEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringCoalCoal miningChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Trident Exploration operates a significant portion of a Mannville-age coalbed methane field near Ft. Assiniboine, Alberta, Canada. This presently is the only commercial Mannville project in Alberta and currently produces about 90mmcf/d. The Mannville coals are wet and artificial lift is extensively used to dewater the coal seam. Well design has evolved throughout the project, starting with vertical wells and then progressing to horizontal and multilateral wells. Each design change has allowed significant production increases, but has also added to the challenge of economically lifting water. Electric submersible pumps and beam pumps are typically used. Rod driven PCPs were used in early stages of the project with limited success. A PCP driven by a downhole motor, or ESPCP, has successfully operated through a 6 month trial period. The ESPCP has shown potential to deal with problems caused by well design and problems inherent with CBM production. Introduction The Corbett Creek project is a wet coalbed methane development located near Fort Assiniboine, Alberta, Canada. Current CBM production is about 90 mmcf/d (2500 e3m3/d). The target formation is the upper Mannville coals, which exist over a broad area across central and southern Alberta. It is estimated that these coals contain more than 360 TCF (10.1 × 1012 m3) of gas (1). Water saturation, gas content, depth, and other properties vary widely throughout the Mannville coals. In the Corbett area, the coal is from 840m to 1100m vertical depth. Two seams are targeted, one being an average of 3m thick and the other 2m thick. Seams are separated by 5m to 10m. Water is removed from the coal seams to reduce bottom hole pressure to a critical point where gas will begin to desorb from the coal. The greater the differential between the desorption pressure and the bottom hole pressure, the greater the amount of gas that will desorb. A pilot project was started in 2000 by Trinity Energy with three evaluation wells. Five more vertical wells were drilled over the next two years to continue evaluation of the area. Trident acquired the properties in 2002 and continued expanding the pilot by drilling 35 more vertical wells over the next two years. Horizontal drilling was introduced in 2004 to improve water inflow, accelerate dewatering and decrease the amount of time to initial gas production. Surface footprint was also significantly reduced. Results proved successful and 40 horizontal wells were drilled over the next two years. In July 2005, Trident and partner Nexen announced Corbett was the first commercial Mannville project in Alberta. In 2006, the multilateral well design was introduced to reduce drilling and artificial lift costs. One multilateral well replaced 3 or 4 single leg horizontals. Multiple seams could be drilled from one well. Gas rates per well also significantly increased and allowed some wells to free flow after an initial dewatering phase. (See CIPC Paper 2008–200 "Economics of Mannville CBM Development: Drilling & Production Innovation at Corbett Creek" by John Cockbill for more detail.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207