MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012733906 · doi:10.1016/j.afjem.2013.12.004

Epidemiology of patients presenting to the emergency centre of Princess Marina Hospital in Gaborone, Botswana

2014· article· en· W2012733906 on OpenAlexaff
Amit Chandra, Paul C. Mullan, Ari Ho‐Foster, Antanoid Langeveldt, Ngaire Caruso, Andrew Kestler

Bibliographic record

VenueAfrican Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpecialtyReferralEpidemiologyFamily medicineMedical emergencyEmergency medicinePediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Emergency medicine is a newly recognized specialty in Botswana and the country launched an emergency medicine residency in January 2011. Data regarding the practice of emergency medicine in Botswana are limited. This study reviewed 1 year of patient presentations to the emergency centre of Princess Marina Hospital, the country’s main referral hospital located in the capital city, Gaborone. Methods Epidemiologic data of all patients presenting to the emergency centre between May 2010 and April 2011 were extracted into a database. The diagnoses of a random sample of patient presentations were coded using the categories outlined by the Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) for ICD-10. For ease of analysis, several CCS categories were grouped together for subsequent analysis. Results 24,905 patient encounters were recorded during the study period. A large proportion of patients were aged between 25 and 50 years old. 20% of patients presented with a traumatic injury. The most common diagnoses across all ages included trauma, pregnancy complications, gastrointestinal disorders, and pneumonia. Conclusion These results can inform the development of emergency medicine education and acute care systems in Botswana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAfrican Journal of Emergency MedicineSame topicEmergency and Acute Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207