MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Numerical and Experimental Analysis of the Pressurized Wave Front in a Circular Pipe

2013· article· en· W2012746740 on OpenAlex
Samba Bousso, Musandji Fuamba

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydraulic Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFront (military)MechanicsUnsteady flowGeologyNumerical analysisHydraulicsGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsMechanical engineeringMathematical analysisAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on pressurized wavefront behavior and an analysis of trapped air pockets. Flow behavior, trapped air-pocket pressure, and different pressurized wavefront shapes in addition to their propagation conditions were investigated to improve modeling of mixed flows with trapped air pockets in stormwater systems. Pipe slopes, inflow, and reservoir water-levels were considered in an experimental analysis of the initiation, propagation of the wavefront, and flow behavior. Results show that the formation, propagation, and stability of the wavefront shape are highly dependent on the reservoir water-level and pipe slope. Pressurized wavefronts take on different shapes depending on manhole water level, pipe slope, and air pressure. The shape of the pressurized wavefront is sharper when the initial pipe depth y* is set between 0.5 and 0.85. With low inflow, the pipe-filling phase is progressive and is accompanied by undulations with stronger curvature and short length on the free-surface flow zone. For mild slopes with low flow-rates, the pipe-filling process is achieved through progressive undulations with trapped air pockets. A two-phase numerical model is developed, combining the method of characteristics (MOCs) for solving the free-surface flow conditions, the rigid column for the pressurized flow conditions, and the ideal gas law. Numerical results are achieved by applying of the continuity equation taking into account any type of flow regime in the interface vicinities. The four equations that consider the direction of wavefront propagation and the type of pressurized or depressurized wavefront are then taken into account. In these equations, a minimum distance between the moving wavefront and the considered cross section on the fixed grid is imposed. Compliance with this minimum distance allows avoiding numerical instabilities that may affect the stability of the model. Good agreement is obtained between numerical and experimental results. This agreement demonstrates that pressure variations due to pressurized waves combined with trapped air-pockets can be reproduced by implementing the numerical model as a shock-fitting approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it