Urban structure and mobility in the context of sustainable development: citizens' opinion about the Thessaloniki submerged tunnel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, on the occasion of the decision to construct the Thessaloniki submerged tunnel (TST), we set the problem of the urban evolution of the city in correlation with mobility, through empirical investigation of the citizens' views. as theoretical tools we use strategic planning and urban governance in order to achieve modern planning proposals that presuppose processes of social transaction between social actors and other social partners (active social groups, agents, etc.) for the sustainable development of the city. methodologically, we worked with 621 questionnaires, within the urban agglomeration of Thessaloniki, which were given out and collected between 7 and 9 march 2007. The statistical analysis of the sample was carried out using the SPSS software. Primarily, we examine the development of the city during the 19th and 20th century in relation to the Thessaloniki linear sprawl problem as well as the communication between the two city poles, the west and the east. We continue with the presentation of the social and spatial features of the sample as well as the major issue of the assessment of the traffic, environmental and urban impacts of the TST. Then, we examine the structure of the urban mobility. This is followed by an analysis of the issues with regard to the housing areas and the intention to use the TST, the reasons for commuting from the west to the east and vice versa, and the evaluation of the impacts according to the housing areas. We also verify the correlation of demographic variables such as sex and age with the use of routes such as the TST, central streets and ring road. finally, we evaluate the impacts of the TST in terms of the association between the intention to use it and variables such as sex and age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".