MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012756103 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2013-0490

Bianchi type-III dark energy models with constant deceleration parameter in self-creation cosmology

2013· article· en· W2012756103 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K. L. Mahanta, A. K. Biswal, P. K. Sahoo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDeceleration parameterDark energyHubble's lawCosmic microwave backgroundLuminosity distanceCosmologyEquation of stateCosmological constantMathematical physicsParameter spaceType (biology)AstrophysicsAnisotropyQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have constructed dark energy cosmological models in an anisotropic Bianchi type-III space–time with a variable equation of state (EoS) parameter ω in Barber’s (Gen. Relativ. Gravitation, 14, 117, 1982) second self-creation theory of gravitation. The models are obtained using the special law of variation of Hubble’s parameter that yields a constant value of the deceleration parameter. In the two different models that we have obtained, the EoS parameter ω for dark energy is found to be time dependent. In one model the value of ω is in good agreement with the recent observations of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) data, SNe Ia data with cosmic microwave background radiation anisotropy and galaxy clustering statistics. Further we have discussed the well-known astrophysical phenomena, namely, the Hubble parameter H(z), luminosity distance dL, proper distance d(z), distance modulus μ(z), and look-back time with red shift. The expression for jerk parameter and statefinder parameters are also derived.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207