MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012758405 · doi:10.2118/169638-ms

Use of Molecular Methods (Pyrosequencing) for Evaluating MIC Potential in Water Systems for Oil Production in the North Sea

2014· article· en· W2012758405 on OpenAlexafffund
Jaspreet Mand, Thomas R. Jack, Gerrit Voordouw, Heike Hoffmann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersGenome AlbertaAlberta InnovatesShell Global Solutions InternationalSuncor Energy IncorporatedGenome Canada
KeywordsSeawaterPyrosequencingEnvironmental chemistrySulfate-reducing bacteriaSulfideSulfurProduced waterChemistryDeltaproteobacteriaSulfateDesulfovibrioEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineering16S ribosomal RNABiologyEcologyGammaproteobacteriaBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The application of molecular methods, like pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes, has now accelerated to the point where identification of microbial communities involved in microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) may become routine. We have used this technology to characterize samples obtained from North Sea oil-producing platforms. Pigging solids were collected from a pipeline that carried a high water content, had a low velocity and cooled rapidly (mesophilic growth conditions), causing high corrosion rates to be expected. A second set of samples was obtained from a platform subjected to produced water reinjection (PWRI). The samples included produced water and PWRI water, a mixture of produced water and seawater. Historically, both locations showed high sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) numbers and the system was deemed to be under corrosion threat. Sulfate concentrations were 2600 ppm in the PWRI water and 170 ppm in produced water, suggesting that sulfate reduction occurred. The pigging solids were found to have high counts of SRB, identified by pyrosequencing to be mostly Desulfovibrio. However, high fractions (13–50%) of sulfur-reducing bacteria (SuRB), of the order Desulfuromonadales were also found. Pyrosequencing indicated that produced water also had more SuRB (48%) than SRB (18%). The PWRI water had a high fraction of the sulfide-oxidizing bacterium (SOB) Arcobacter (25%). The data suggest that mixing of produced water and oxygenated seawater gives rise to chemical and microbial (Arcobacter) oxidation of sulfide to sulfur, which is then reduced to sulfide by the SuRB using oil organics as electron donor. The predominance of SOB and SuRB indicates that sulfur is prevalent in the system, which indicates that MIC may be involved in this environment. Application of molecular methods greatly facilitates the collection of this information and is thus an important tool in assessing MIC threat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207