Preparation and SO<sub>2</sub> Absorption/Desorption Properties of Crosslinked Poly(1,1,3,3‐Tetramethylguanidine Acrylate) Porous Particles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Summary: Novel crosslinked porous particles based on the ionic copolymer of 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidine acrylate (TMGA) and N,N‐methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) were prepared via an inverse suspension polymerization using cyclohexane as continuous phase and Span 60 as the dispersant. The SO2 absorption–desorption properties of the P(TMGA‐co‐MBA) particles were studied for the first time. The particles showed excellent SO2 absorption properties: high capacity and rate. These absorption properties, as well as the particle volume, shape, and morphology, remained unchanged during the SO2 absorption–desorption cycles. The material appeared to be a good candidate as SO2 absorbent for fuel gas desulfurization (FGD) and purification of other SO2‐containing gases. Optical microscope image of the P(TMGA‐co‐MBA) porous particles. magnified image Optical microscope image of the P(TMGA‐co‐MBA) porous particles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".