Interface hepatitis is associated with a high incidence of late graft fibrosis in a group of tightly monitored pediatric orthotopic liver transplantation patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic graft dysfunction, manifesting with elevated liver enzymes and histological features of interface hepatitis (IH), is being increasingly recognized as a long-term problem after liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to characterize our group of post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients with respect to clinical, laboratory, and histological signs of IH. A retrospective study of charts and liver biopsy specimens from patients transplanted between 1986 and 1999 was used. Histological features of IH were found in 29/119 patients at a median interval of 23.9 months (95% confidence interval -28.2 to 52.6) after OLT. All patients with IH had risk factors for chronic rejection, such as steroid-resistant rejection, acute rejection later than 3 months post-OLT, female receiver of male graft, or pretransplant cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive serology with a CMV-negative donor liver. None of the 29 had features favoring a diagnosis of de novo autoimmune hepatitis, but 4 had isolated hypergammaglobulinemia, and 4 had non-organ-specific autoantibodies without hyperimmunoglobulin G. Sixteen of 29 patients also had features of chronic rejection, such as foam cell arteriopathy, loss of bile ducts, or pericentral fibrosis. After abnormal biopsy, all but 1 patient were switched to tacrolimus. During a median follow-up of 12 years, death occurred in 5, retransplantation occurred in 7, and definite cirrhosis occurred in 4. In conclusion, IH was detected in 24.4% of our patients and was associated with a high degree of fibrosis development. Most likely, IH represents a form of chronic rejection directed against periportal hepatocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".