MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012767994 · doi:10.1055/s-2007-992338

Interstitial Fluid Pressure in Free Vascularized Skin Flaps of the Rat Epigastrium

2007· article· en· W2012767994 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reconstructive Microsurgery · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEdemaSurgeryTransplantationFree flapHemodynamicsAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to observe the magnitude and time course of changes in tissue edema in experimental free flaps. Thirty female Sprague Dawley rats underwent elevation and orthoptic transplantation of free epigastric skin flaps. Using a modified "wick in needle" technique, interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) was measured in the flaps at various times up to 2 weeks postoperatively. Increases in IFP to positive values were seen by 12 hours. IFP remained elevated for 3 to 5 days, after which they gradually returned to control values by 2 weeks. This is the first study to follow the time course and magnitude of changes in IFP and edema in free flaps. It is a useful animal model by which the hemodynamic effects of physical and pharmacological manipulation of flaps can be studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it