MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012780079 · doi:10.1680/macr.2001.53.1.43

Behaviour of high-strength concrete plates under impact loading

2001· article· en· W2012780079 on OpenAlexaff
Suryawan Murtiadi, H. Marzouk

Bibliographic record

VenueMagazine of Concrete Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Response to Dynamic Loads
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProjectileStructural engineeringMaterials scienceReinforcementDeflection (physics)Failure mode and effects analysisPunchingComposite materialGeotechnical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research programme was carried out to investigate the behaviour of high-strength concrete plates subjected to impact loading. The research includes an experimental investigation on 16 concrete plates. A rigid projectile was used to apply the impact load to the tested reinforced concrete specimens. The rigid projectile consisted mainly of a solid steel cylinder with 220 kg mass and 304·5 mm dia. contact area, dropped at variable heights of up to 4 m. The structural behaviour with respect to deflection, concrete and steel strains, failure mode and energy absorption was examined. The effects of dynamic loading, concrete strength, reinforcement ratio and support pattern were the test parameters. Based on the experimental test results, it has been found that at a test velocity of 4−7 m/s the impact load is about twice the static punching shear capacity estimated from code provisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagazine of Concrete ResearchSame topicStructural Response to Dynamic LoadsFrench-language works237,207