MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012780079 · doi:10.1680/macr.2001.53.1.43

Behaviour of high-strength concrete plates under impact loading

2001· article· en· W2012780079 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMagazine of Concrete Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Response to Dynamic Loads
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProjectileStructural engineeringMaterials scienceReinforcementDeflection (physics)Failure mode and effects analysisPunchingComposite materialGeotechnical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research programme was carried out to investigate the behaviour of high-strength concrete plates subjected to impact loading. The research includes an experimental investigation on 16 concrete plates. A rigid projectile was used to apply the impact load to the tested reinforced concrete specimens. The rigid projectile consisted mainly of a solid steel cylinder with 220 kg mass and 304·5 mm dia. contact area, dropped at variable heights of up to 4 m. The structural behaviour with respect to deflection, concrete and steel strains, failure mode and energy absorption was examined. The effects of dynamic loading, concrete strength, reinforcement ratio and support pattern were the test parameters. Based on the experimental test results, it has been found that at a test velocity of 4−7 m/s the impact load is about twice the static punching shear capacity estimated from code provisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it